The government has been very slow in embracing Chinese medicine as a potentially fertile field for both science and commerce. Ignorance is one reason. Pre-occupation with the entanglement in the politics of "political reform" could be another. In any event, it is not a competent government if it could not do more than one thing at a time. The epoch of "laissez-faire" is over. Modern governments should be more engaging and should seek to create opportunities for its constituents.
謝謝貴會對中醫藥的關注。對於上述五點我稍回應一下:
回覆刪除1.香港有條件發展中醫藥，但需政府有相應政策配合。單靠企業或科研界未知如何「大力」去發展?
2. 香港發展中醫藥之「怎樣」必須背靠內地，最關鍵仍是醫帶藥，沒有中醫院則體驗不了中醫藥的循證醫學。除了良醫還需優質藥材与飲片，香港必須做好品質的把關才有望進一步發展中醫藥。
3. 香港發展中醫藥之優勢在於科研、法規、貿易等既存有效制度
4. 還需尊貴的曾特首「發號施令」去「起錨」，目前這個錨委實深沉海溝，中醫藥界哪有氣力起錨啟航呢?
5. 貴會的建議書不正是一個「全面性」的中醫藥發展政策的藍本嗎? 望政府好好的去參考、與智囊團營造多驘的經濟產業。
The government has been very slow in embracing Chinese medicine as a potentially fertile field for both science and commerce. Ignorance is one reason. Pre-occupation with the entanglement in the politics of "political reform" could be another. In any event, it is not a competent government if it could not do more than one thing at a time. The epoch of "laissez-faire" is over. Modern governments should be more engaging and should seek to create opportunities for its constituents.
回覆刪除